29 May Maternity and perinatal mental health strategy for involving the public in research
Home › News & insights › Blog and commentary
26 November 2020
Maternity and perinatal mental health strategy for involving the public in research
ARC South London’s maternity and perinatal mental health research theme is committed to undertaking research ‘with’ service users and the public, rather than doing it ‘to’, ‘about’ or ‘for’ them.
The PPIE strategy group
The patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) strategy group comprises similar numbers of community members and researchers. Community members include an ethnically diverse group of recent service users, network leaders, maternity voices partnership representatives and charity managers. The group also has two PPIE leads whose work encompasses relationship building, communications, supporting community members, and PPIE advice and planning.
The group has developed a terms of reference document articulating their collective goal and purpose:
“To create a culture of active patient and public involvement, where research is carried out ‘with’ or ‘by’ members of the public and in which strong links and networks are developed with individuals and organisations to ensure socially and ethnically diverse communities are at the centre of our research — including those living in poverty, facing disadvantage and with socially complex lives.”

Mary Newburn, maternity and perinatal mental health public involvement lead.
What the strategy group will do
The group has adopted the principles of diversity and inclusion committed to at ARC South London. The maternity and perinatal mental health research strategy group will:
✓
Advise — for example by co-producing values and good practice for collaborative partnership working
✓
Promote diversity and inclusion in the recruitment of researchers, research participants and stakeholder advisers
✓
Model good practice and promote guidance on PPIE
✓
Identify suitable training on PPIE and co-production, collaborate with other ARCs and organisations leading on PPIE, and look for sources of funding for PPIE training
Reflections from the November meeting
At the group’s November meeting, an induction talk providing orientation for researchers and community members was considered ‘really helpful’ and ‘pitched at the right level’. It was circulated after the meeting with links to resources including the NIHR Standards for public involvement in research and the INCLUDE graphic.
Workshops were held on training needs and the role of PPIE lead or co-investigator roles. Participants felt that combined training for both community members and researchers would be beneficial.
👥
PPIE leads as ‘intermediaries’
It was felt that PPIE leads and co-investigators, together with maternity or perinatal mental health charities, can act as ‘intermediaries’ bridging between communities and researchers. A researcher raised the issue of how little ethical guidance exists about asking service users to become advisers from a lived experience perspective, compared with the extensive ethical procedures safeguarding recruitment as study participants.
❤
Self-care for service user advisers
A service user emphasised the importance of supporting people who accept invitations to ‘get involved’ in research to practise self-care, so that they are helped to manage the potential stress of re-living past, difficult experiences.
🤝
Reciprocal, mutually beneficial relationships
The group were keen for the relationship between researchers and community members to be reciprocal and beneficial to both parties. Information would be circulated about sources of funding for further training, as some PPIE advisers aspire to becoming service user researchers.
References
[1] INVOLVE. What is public involvement in research?
[2] NHS England. Better Births: Improving outcomes of maternity services in England — A Five Year Forward View for maternity care. NHS England 2016.
[3] NHS England. The Perinatal Mental Health Care Pathways. NHS England 2018.
[4] NIHR. Improving inclusion of under-served groups in clinical research: Guidance from INCLUDE project.
[5] Meagher L, Lyall C. The invisible made visible: using impact evaluations to illuminate and inform the role of knowledge intermediaries. Evid Policy J Res Debate Pract. 2013;9:409–18.
Related content
- →
Patient and public involvement and engagement in maternity and perinatal mental health - →
Engaging local women in maternity research during the Covid-19 pandemic — Mary Newburn, June 2020 - →
Resources to support involvement in research - →
Maternity and perinatal mental health research at ARC South London
Original source: arc-sl.nihr.ac.uk — NIHR ARC South London legacy content archived May 2026.
No Comments